Petition of William Good for Restitution for Sarah Good, Dorothy Good, & Infant
Back to Cornell: Division of Rare and Manuscript Collections | Back to Archive List

Recto

Facsimile
cornell.edu

Source Citation UNCAT MS, Witchcraft Collection, no. 4620, Division of Rare and Manuscript Collections, Cornell University Library.
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009) No. 907: Petition of William Good for Restitution for Sarah Good, Dorothy Good, & Infant
  • Sept. 13, 1710: Petition for Payment
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation
[?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977) Vol. 3, p. 994: Account of William Good -- Cases of Sarah Good and Dorcas Good
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960)
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864) not available


Home Page | Manuscript Archives | Rare Books | Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt | Salem Witchcraft Papers | Woodward (1864) | Search