Deposition of Priscilla Chub v. Abigail Hobbs
Back to Misc: W. Elliot Woodward, Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864) | Back to Archive List
Source Citation W. Elliot Woodward, Records of Salem Witchcraft, Copied from ther Original Documents., 2 vols. (Privately printed, Roxbury, MA: 1864) Vol. 1, pp. 177-78.

Facsimile of original publication: http://www.archive.org/details/recordssalemwit00woodgoog
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009) No. 68: Deposition of Priscilla Chub v. Abigail Hobbs
  • April 19, 1692: Deposition
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation
[?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977) Vol. 2, p. 415: Priscilla Chub v. Abigail Hobbs
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960)
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864) Vol. 1, pp. 177-178: Prescilla Chub v. Abigail Hobbs


Home Page | Manuscript Archives | Rare Books | Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt | Salem Witchcraft Papers | Woodward (1864) | Search