Statements of John Arnold & Mary Arnold for Mary Esty & Sarah Cloyce
|
Side 1
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
|
Source Citation
|
Essex County Court Archives, vol. 1, no. 296, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Judicial Archives, on deposit James Duncan Phillips Library, Peabody Essex Museum, Salem, MA.
|
|
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009)
|
No. 602: Statements of John Arnold & Mary Arnold for Mary Esty & Sarah Cloyce
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
† indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
‡ indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation
[?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt for more information about how dates were assigned.
Sept. 9, 1692‡: Statement for
|
|
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977)
|
Vol. 1, p. 294: John and Mary Arnold for Mary Easty and Sarah Cloyce
|
|
Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive (University of Virginia, 2019)
|
No. 45.10: Statement of John and Mary Arnold for Mary Esty and Sarah Cloyce
|
|
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864)
|
N/A |
| Godbeer's The Salem Witch Hunt (2011)
|
N/A
|
|
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960)
|
N/A |
