Deposition of Thomas Burnam Jr. v. Rachel Clinton
|
Side 1
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
Source Citation
|
Collection 77, Box 1, Folder 19, Maine Historical Society. Portland, ME.
|
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009)
|
No. 36: Deposition of Thomas Burnam Jr. v. Rachel Clinton
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
† indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
‡ indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation [?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt for more information about how dates were assigned.
March 30, 1692†: Deposition
|
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977)
|
N/A |
Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive (University of Virginia, 2019)
|
No. 32.8: Deposition of Thomas Burnam Jr. v. Rachel Clinton
|
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864)
|
N/A |
Godbeer's The Salem Witch Hunt (2011)
|
N/A
|
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960)
|
N/A |