Deposition of Elizabeth Booth v. Daniel Andrew & Mary Warren
|
Side 1
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
|
Source Citation
|
Essex County Court Archives, vol. 1, no. 118, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Judicial Archives, on deposit James Duncan Phillips Library, Peabody Essex Museum, Salem, MA.
|
|
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009)
|
No. 167: Deposition of Elizabeth Booth v. Daniel Andrew & Mary Warren
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
† indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
‡ indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best approximation
[?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt for more information about how dates were assigned.
May 18, 1692: Deposition
|
|
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977)
|
Vol. 3, pp. 803-804: Elizabeth Booth v. Mary Warren and Daniel Andrew
|
|
Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive (University of Virginia, 2019)
|
No. 135.7: Deposition of Elizabeth Booth v. Mary Warren and Daniel Andrew
|
|
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864)
|
Vol. 1, pp. 133-134: Eliz Book vs. Mary Warren
|
| Godbeer's The Salem Witch Hunt (2011)
|
N/A
|
|
Levin's What Happened in Salem? (1960)
|
N/A |
