Statement of Susannah Shelden v. Philip English, Sarah Buckley, Mary Whittredge, Bridget Bishop, Giles Cory, Mary English, & Martha Cory
Back to PEM: Essex County Court Archives, Vol. 1
|
Back to Archive List
|
Side 1
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
Side 2
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
Side 3
Small
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
|
Source Citation
|
Essex County Court Archives, vol. 1, nos. 153, 154 & 168, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Judicial Archives, on deposit James Duncan Phillips Library, Peabody Essex Museum, Salem, MA.
|
|
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009)
|
No. 164: Statement of Susannah Shelden v. Philip English, Sarah Buckley, Mary Whittredge, Bridget Bishop, Giles Cory, Mary English, & Martha Cory
May 17, 1692‡: Statement Against
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
† indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
‡ indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best
approximation
[?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt |
|
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977)
|
Vol. 1, pp. 105-106: Susannah Sheldon v. Bridget Bishop, Mary English, Phillip English, Giles Corey, and Martha Corey
Vol. 1, pp. 320-321: Susannah Sheldon v. Phillip English, Sarah Buckley and Mary Witheridge
|
|
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864)
|
Vol. 1, pp. 191-193: Susanna Sheldon v. P. English
|
|
