Examination of George Burroughs and Statement of Abigail Hobbs v. George Burroughs
Back to MHS: Salem Witchcraft Papers
|
Back to Archive List
|
Side 1
Small
virginia.edu
Medium
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
Side 2
Small
virginia.edu
Medium
virginia.edu
Large
virginia.edu
|
|
|
Source Citation
|
UNCAT MS, Miscellaneous Manuscripts (1692), Massachusetts Historical Society. Boston, MA.
|
|
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (2009)
|
No. 120: Examination of George Burroughs and Statement of Abigail Hobbs v. George Burroughs
May 9, 1692: Examination
May 11, 1692: Statement
No symbol after the date indicates that the assigned date is certain. This is typically based on the inclusion of the date in the text of the document
† indicates that although there is no date on the document itself, internal references or other evidence make the dating probable
‡ indicates that there is no original date present in the record itself, and there is a lack of sufficient circumstantial evidence, so the date given is the best
approximation
[?] after the date indicates that a date cannot be established with any level of confidence, and a speculative date or month has been assigned
See pp. 98-99 of Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt |
|
The Salem Witchcraft Papers (1977)
|
Vol. 1, pp. 153-154: Examination of George Burroughs and Summary of Evidence
|
|
Woodward's Records of Salem Witchcraft (1864)
|
Vol. 2, pp. 109-111: Examination of George Burrough
|
